Yesterday, the FDA proposed a $50,000 limit on financial ties to industry of its advisory board members (see "FDA Proposes New, Tougher Procedures for Membership on Advisory Committees").
But, as anyone can clearly see in the following "Algorithm for Considering Advisory Committee Member Participation," there is a BIG loophole (outlined in red):
Still can't read it? [I certainly hope the folks at FDA have a wall-chart version of this algorithm.]
It says, "If the individual is an SGE, does the need for the individual's services outweigh the potential for conflict of interest?" If so, Pass Go and Collect your ticket to come on board!
OK, to be fair, there are only a very few qualified physicians among the 500,000 or so out there that would be willing to serve on FDA advisory committees. I'm sure the pay is not great. Therefore, FDA needs this lopphole. Right? [BTW, maybe if the pay was higher FDA might be able to close this loophole and simplify the algorithm.]
We can argue whether or not $50,000 is still a lot of money -- I think it is -- but at least the new proposed guidelines eliminate the much-criticized 2000 Waiver Criteria. Under those criteria, "the dollar value of the disqualifying financial interest including its value in relationship to the individual's overall assets" could be considered when granting a waiver. That was a pretty big loophole. $50,000 easily may represent only 1-2% of a successful physician's assets.