Several studies have shown that this call to action of DTC works. In 2003, for example, the FDA released preliminary results from a physician survey it conducted (see "Results from FDA Physician Survey on DTC Advertising"). The survey profiled 250 GP's and 250 specialists (dermatology, allergy/pulmonology, endocrinology, and psychiatry) from a random sample of the AMA Physician Masterfile, which includes a list of all U.S. medical school graduates.
One question the FDA survey asked was:
"Think about the most recent interaction you've had with a patient ... Can you think of a patient who initiated a discussion about a prescription drug they saw advertised?"Ninety-two percent (92%) of the physicians surveyed said "Yes". (You can find this study here.)
Surveys of consumers seem to confirm the FDA's study results. According to eMarketer:
Much of the growth in DTC advertising is driven by one thing: consumer behavior. Of the 546 US adults surveyed online by MRxHealth and Medical Marketing & Media in March, 87% said they had requested and received a specific prescription drug from their doctor. -- "Pharmaceuticals Online: Direct-to-Patient Becomes a Reality", August, 2006. eMarketerContrarian View
CommonHealth, arguably part of the world's leading healthcare-communications network (ie, pharmaceutical advertising agency), filed research with the FDA this past July on direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising that challenges the effectiveness of DTC's Call to Action.
In a nutshell, CommonHealth claims that DTC advertising is rarely referenced by patients when visiting physicians. Their study says this happens only in 0.6% of visits! (See "CommonHealth Releases Compelling Results of Independent Large-Scale Study on DTC Advertising".)
How can the FDA and CommonHealth be so far apart on this issue (92% vs. 0.6%)? It's like they are on different planets!
Well, the methodologies they used are different: FDA asked physicians what they thought they heard, CommonHealth recorded actual patient-physician conversations and did a linguistic analysis looking to see if the patient said something like "I saw/heard this ad and want this prescription drug".
According to CommonHealth:
"What has not been available are data derived from direct recording and analysis of actual physician-patient visits -- and so, in a real sense, both supporters and critics of DTC advertising have been 'flying blind'."I haven't been able to get hold of the report that CommonHealth submitted to the FDA, so I cannot critically analyze their methodology. The report hasn't been posted to the FDA Web site and CommonHealth refused to give me a copy. The FDA official who received the report from CommonHealth also could not give a copy when I asked her. The only way to get it is to visit the FDA Dockets Management branch in Bethesda, MD and ask to see Docket No. 2005N-0354; Consumer-Directed Promotion of Regulated Medical Products; Part 15 Public Hearing; EMC 590 CommonHealth Vol #: 12. Maybe I'll submit an FOIA request. Good luck on that!
I was able to speak to Brad Davidson, Ph.D., a vice president at MBS/Vox and lead researcher for the study (I may report on this in an upcoming issue of Pharma Marketing News).
It's apparent from my conversations with Dr. Davidson and from press releases, that the purpose of the study was to refute "many of the assumptions of both academic and public policy critics of DTC" and support the positive impact of DTC.
"We know that DTC has an effect on physician-patient interactions because other studies have shown that DTC drives patients into the office and raises awareness of both conditions and medications," said Davidson. "What our study uncovered is that DTC does not have the negative impact on the actual dialogue that many people allege."FDA was definitely not one of these people. It concluded from its study -- despite the 92% number contradicting CommonHealth -- that DTC has had a positive impact!
Anyway, CommonHealth -- among the best advertising minds in the world -- leaves us with this insight from its study:
"We know DTC advertising works ... we may not know how."This is an incredible admission! It's as if they are saying that advertising exists on a higher plane where it is impossible to analyze what works and what doesn't a priori. You might as well trash focus groups that ask consumers if, after seeing a drug ad, they would ask for the drug when they next visit their doctors. Yeah, I'm sure that would happen!